RE: paying babysitters and liability | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: TR Ruddick (truddick![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 13:44:10 -0600 (MDT) |
> Date: Sun, 14 Sep 03 22:23:37 -0800 > From: Lynn Nadeau <welcome [at] olympus.net> > Lynn here. I didn't make our concern clear. We are not worried about > "nanny" laws or unpaid taxes, but about liability suits in the case of > injury. Sitter breaks his back while subduing freaked out child, or is > tripped by a chair in the kid room, etc. If he were simply a visitor > wandering through RoseWind, and broke his leg in a hole on the commons, > it would be paid by our general liability coverage. But such coverage is > void if the person is there for pay. Thanks for the clarification--makes sense now. I'm guessing that you'll want to check with your liability insurer and arrange to have coverage, if your policy currently doesn't make exception for the types of work-for-hire that people commonly take on in their own homes (which would include child care, lawn care, other odd jobs). TR Ruddick Dayton Cohousing. _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
-
Re: paying babysitters and liability Lynn Nadeau, September 14 2003
-
RE: Re: paying babysitters and liability Sue Pniewski, September 15 2003
- Re: Re: paying babysitters and liability David Mandel, September 16 2003
- RE: paying babysitters and liability TR Ruddick, September 15 2003
-
RE: Re: paying babysitters and liability Sue Pniewski, September 15 2003
-
RE: Re: paying babysitters and liability Sue Pniewski, September 17 2003
- Re: Re: paying babysitters and liability David Mandel, September 18 2003
- RE: Re: paying babysitters and liability Sue Pniewski, September 18 2003
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.