Should individual "sponsorship" be allowed of community property? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Racheli Gai (racheli![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 14:13:08 -0600 (MDT) |
I basically agree with Joe. If something an individual wishes to contribute is seen as useful by the community, that's a good thing. I don't feel that it implies that the giver will have any kind of special power/privilege. It hasen't been that way with us, as least so far... R. >Elizabeth Stevenson wrote: >>I'm sorry, but I still don't see how allowing people to contribute what they >>want to specific projects is fair. Those with more money have more say. >>Period. Doesn't this bother anyone else? >> >I'm just putting out what seems to work well for us (a system that has >evolved over 7 years) - YMMV. >If someone kicks in an extra $40 because they really want those cherry >trees, then I personally don't experience that as unfair. For me it's a >wonderful example of a "gift economy". If they were doing something >objectionable with the money, the proposal would have been rejected. I >guess it comes down to how you see your neighbors - loving benefactors >or self-serving capitalists. >>Why is this necessary? If your process is working, the community should be >>getting things paid for that need paying for, >> >I don't know if it's necessary, but we have found it desirable and >efficient. Part of the issue, I think, is that the system saves us from >having many hours of discussion trying to prioritize relatively trivial >projects - everyone allocating their portion in parallel makes for a >very speedy process. You could use the same system & get this benefit, >but disallow the extra contributions if you wanted. >(If you really want an egalitarian community, you need to equalize >incomes, not just spending, yes?) >_______________________________________________ >Cohousing-L mailing list >Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: >http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L -- ----------------------------------------------------------- racheli [at] sonoracohousing.com (Racheli Gai) ----------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
- Should individual "sponsorship" be allowed of community property?, (continued)
-
Should individual "sponsorship" be allowed of community property? Randa Johnson, September 24 2003
-
Re: Should individual "sponsorship" be allowed of community property? Joe Nolan, September 24 2003
- Re: Should individual "sponsorship" be allowed of community property? Elizabeth Stevenson, September 24 2003
- Re: Should individual "sponsorship" be allowed of community property? Joe Nolan, September 24 2003
- Should individual "sponsorship" be allowed of community property? Racheli Gai, September 24 2003
-
Re: Should individual "sponsorship" be allowed of community property? Joe Nolan, September 24 2003
- Re: Should individual "sponsorship" be allowed of community Howard Landman, September 25 2003
- Re: Should individual "sponsorship" be allowed of community Elizabeth Stevenson, September 25 2003
- Should individual "sponsorship" be allowed of community Racheli Gai, September 25 2003
- Re: Should individual "sponsorship" be allowed of community Elizabeth Stevenson, September 25 2003
-
Should individual "sponsorship" be allowed of community property? Randa Johnson, September 24 2003
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.