Re: Should individual "sponsorship" be allowed of community | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Elizabeth Stevenson (tamgoddesscomcast.net) | |
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 09:26:07 -0600 (MDT) |
I have been living here for TEN YEARS. While it doesn't make me the oracle of knowledge, I do have a perspective that is being ignored because I'm perceived as being overly emotional about this, in spite of evidence to the contrary. In that time, several different households have been the "poorest family" in our community. I can tell you that it's *NEVER* the poorest family that blocks consensus on spending money. This is not about the poorest family, it's about fairness. You might just as easily say this is about the family with the most disposable income. If you structure your HOA dues so that everyone can reasonably pay them, (again, we've done this for 10 years) there's absolutely no reason why any particular family would block consensus on the basis of their inability to pay. And since it seems to bear repeating, I'm not talking about items that cost 100 bucks, either. We've paid for many such things without consensus. What price is too high to pay for equality? Shall we just throw out the idea of consensus entirely because you think it might be inconvenient? -- Liz Stevenson Southside Park Cohousing Sacramento, California tamgoddess [at] comcast.net > From: Howard Landman <howard [at] polyamory.org> > Reply-To: cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org > Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 05:46:29 -0700 (PDT) > To: cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org > Subject: Re: [C-L]_Should individual "sponsorship" be allowed of community > > >> I still don't see how allowing people to contribute what they >> want to specific projects is fair. Those with more money have more say. >> Period. Doesn't this bother anyone else? >> >> Why is this necessary? If your process is working, the community should be >> getting things paid for that need paying for, and anything that is not a >> priority for the whole community shouldn't be paid for. > > Yes, Liz, but on the other hand, is it fair for the single poorest family > in the community to block progress on major projects that they feel they > can't afford? And that most other families want? If you require that > everything be funded perfectly fairly, this is what will happen much of > the time. Are you willing to accept that as the price of equality? > > Howard A. Landman > River Rock Commons > Fort Collins, Colorado _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
- Re: Should individual "sponsorship" be allowed of community property?, (continued)
- Re: Should individual "sponsorship" be allowed of community property? Elizabeth Stevenson, September 24 2003
- Re: Should individual "sponsorship" be allowed of community property? Joe Nolan, September 24 2003
- Should individual "sponsorship" be allowed of community property? Racheli Gai, September 24 2003
- Re: Should individual "sponsorship" be allowed of community Howard Landman, September 25 2003
- Re: Should individual "sponsorship" be allowed of community Elizabeth Stevenson, September 25 2003
- Should individual "sponsorship" be allowed of community Racheli Gai, September 25 2003
- Re: Should individual "sponsorship" be allowed of community Elizabeth Stevenson, September 25 2003
- Re: feeling shame/guilt Racheli Gai, September 25 2003
- Re: Re: feeling shame/guilt Elizabeth Stevenson, September 25 2003
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.