Re: quorum | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 17:32:19 -0700 (MST) |
On 2/17/04 7:29 PM, "Susan L. Hedgpeth" <hedgpeth [at] uclink4.berkeley.edu> wrote: > To my mind the problem with proxies is that people are making up their mind > before the meeting. What if the discussion brings up points they have not > heard of or thought of? What if listening to their neighbors changes their > mind about the issue? If they aren't at the meeting, they aren't part of > the group process which is integral to consensus. I agree. The only reason I can think of to have a meeting is to have a discussion. And the only reason to have a discussion is to inform and illuminate one's self and others on an issue. Proxies circumvent this process. With the advent of email (and photocopiers) many former uses of meetings are irrelevant today, particularly in communities where people know and see each other frequently. Sharon -- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
- Re: quorum, (continued)
- Re: quorum Sharon Villines, February 17 2004
- RE: quorum Rodney Elin, February 18 2004
- Re: quorum Susan L. Hedgpeth, February 17 2004
- Re: quorum Sharon Villines, February 17 2004
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.