Re: play structure/natural playgrounds | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Elaine (itchyink![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 13:27:09 -0700 (MST) |
Does your community have a soft surface that meets government standards under your play structure? Looks like we are getting rid of our play structure because it is almost $5000 to grade and put in the required mulch, and not having the soft surface is a source of contention here. Worries of injuries and lawsuits vs. the don't worry about it crowd. I have done a fair amount of research and the injury/lawsuit worries seem pretty valid. Unfortunately our common area is on quite a slope (with drainage problems) so it makes the surface issue tricky. We are looking at natural playground ideas to replace it. I have done a fair amount of research and there are some interesting ideas that replace the standard play structure idea, like boulders, something to climb on (rock wall, log, palisades or simple jungle gym), a little house to hide in or climb on top of, shrubbery to hide in, sand, water features, and more. Does anyone have interesting play features that the kids like? Maybe with a great play space we could attract more kids (although i think our indoor play spaces are great). Of course we need to keep it cheap. But the studies say kids need earth, water, a place to hide, a place to get up high and something to build to be happiest. Funny we have to build this sort of environment when i grew up finding it all in the nearby woods. Elaine _________________________________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
- Re: Teenagers and their connections, (continued)
- Re: Teenagers and their connections Elaine, March 18 2004
- Re: [C-L] Children [Was Teenagers and their connections] Sharon Villines, March 19 2004
- Re: play structure/natural playgrounds Elaine, March 19 2004
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.