|Re: architectural review||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: Lynn Nadeau (welcomeolympus.net)|
|Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 10:58:18 -0700 (PDT)|
At RW, Architectural Review has two components, advisory, and requirements. At a minimum, we need to have a meeting with the AR committee and any interested community members, with floor plans, site plan, elevations (exterior view plans), parking plan, and the footprint staked out on the site with stakes and string or flagging tape. Preferably, also a pre-meeting, when plans are still in draft form, to give some guidance when it's not so much a done deal. This has proven valuable. REQUIREMENTS: We review the home site boundaries, legal setback requirements for structures, propane tank; how it fits in with the parking plan - how many spaces on the home site, plus how many and where, on the adjacent street or commons areas. We make sure they know where the appropriate utility stubs are located . We review the rules about responsibilty: the owner is ultimately responsible for the actions of their contractors and sub contractors, regarding any damage to commons, any problematic loose dogs, etc. If any adjacent common land will be needed for staging construction materials, or for vehicle or equipment access to the site (concrete trucks, bulldozers, delivery trucks), this needs to be agreed upon ahead of time, and any impact restored after completion. We point out any vulnerable areas of plantings, underground utilities, etc, which need to be safeguarded. Any other aspects of the house plan are simply governed by city, fire, and building codes. We ensure that people have consulted with their near neighbors about matters that might concern them. Informal discussion and consideration are the only requirements there. ADVISORY: A valuable component of the AR is the opportunity for input from others. Some of our members are in construction trades "You know, if you make your house one foot wider, you can save money by using standard roof trusses..." or have built houses before "We found it really useful to have a hose bib and an exterior outlet on each side of the building." Some advice, I just said "thanks, but that's not what I'd want" (spiral staircase), but other advice I took and was glad (little porch off my kitchen for trash can, compost, garden tools). Plans are posted in the Common House ahead of time; before we had a CH, we'd make drawings and descriptions and mail them to members. Even if advice isn't taken, it helps to have a "speak-now-or-forever-hold-your-peace" opportunity. I was motivated to start the AR committee and process after someone built a somewhat controversial house and I got really tired of hearing people gossiping about it: "Can you believe they built THAT.....?" My own house was next to be built, and I wanted it OUT if anyone had issues with it! So I was the first guinea pig and it has worked well ever since. Some vagueness about what auxiliary structures need AR- garages, cabins, storage sheds? Some run it by us all, some don't. Lynn Nadeau, RoseWind Cohousing Port Townsend Washington (Victorian seaport, music, art, nature) http://www.rosewind.org http://www.ptguide.com http://www.ptforpeace.info (very active peace movement here- see our photo)
- Re: Architectural Review, (continued)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.