Re: RFPs and developers | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Craig Ragland (craigraglandgmail.com) | |
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2007 09:34:29 -0800 (PST) |
Paul, I don't think you're facing large problems here... just various interests that you need to be creative about aligning. As I see it, you really need to understand the model of power-sharing that CoHousing Partners and its respective creators (Wonderland Hill and The CoHousing Company) have evolved. After using different business models in high tech and then retiring from Microsoft in '05, I find their approach very powerful and am now applying it to a situation very similar to yours... for New Earth Song Cohousing (www.NewEarthSong.com). The New Earth Song LLC (in formation) consists of 3 families that reside at Songaia Cohousing (www.Songaia.com) and 2 families that currently live in Seattle. We expect to PARTNER with a housing developer to develop a for-profit project that uses the same basic investment and control model as CoHousing Partners. The two pieces of land we will develop is owned by two entities - a half acre is owned by 5 members of Songaia and 4.3 acres is owned by a long-time neighbor that loves Songaia... in fact, he's visiting Songaia now, staying in one of our guest rooms. The main purpose of his visit is to make progress on "The Deal" (actually, just the parts that pertain to tying up, and then buying his land for the project)... Tomorrow, we sit down with our prospective developer, that is working on a Feasibility Study and... hopefully, we will make great progress on the land acquisition. BTW, we are being led through our first Site Planning Workshop today by an architect who hopes to be the project's architect... more aligning of interests. Like you, we have a high degree of freedom and power given the strength of the existing community. Songaia is a very successful, strongly aligned group with plenty of assets, including tremendously appreciated land values... even in this market! As I understand the CoHousing Partners model, the (experienced) developer controls the project, while the community controls the whole community, which includes the most important parts about the land development project, as it pertains to community interests. I've spent many hours learning about this model... it is really cheap for you to get a leg up on this by attending Katie McCamant's webinar tomorrow, just click here: http://cohousing.org/cohousing-workshops.aspx and register to participate as she shares her insights based on involvement with developing more cohousing projects than anyone else in the US, except perhaps Jim Leach, who is, of course, Katie's business partner in CoHousing Partners. Thanks for the set-up to, once again, pitch the Coho/US Webinar, but the approach they use is extremely relevant to your situation... you'll also, likely, get lots of input from others on this listserv... After having been part of a community that self-developed, there is no way that I can be part of New Earth Song unless we have a professional developer who is taking an active, participatory role as a true partner... I just have way too much to do and too little time left to devote to work to commit that many years (again) to the details of land development. I'd far prefer to align interests so that our development partner - and landowner and community member investors - all make enough profit to have good incentives to build community together... all of us are serving our own, enlightened self-interests and none of us pursuing profit without balancing the needs of people and the planet (for more on this, learn about Triple Bottom Line): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triple_bottom_line Craig Ragland On Nov 30, 2007 4:32 AM, Paul L. Della Maggiora <paul [at] barkingdog.us> wrote: > While we are on the topic, Gabrielle and I are considering the use of a > professional developer and builder for our proposed Footpath community. > I'm > coming to the conclusion that we can maintain affordability by avoiding > the > many and deep potholes being new developers brings. My goal is to get an > ecological cohousing community built in an affordable manner, not to start > a > career in the development and building trades
- Re: RFPs and developers, (continued)
- Re: RFPs and developers Dirk Herr-Hoyman, November 29 2007
-
Re: RFPs and developers Fred H Olson, November 29 2007
-
Re: RFPs and developers Paul L. Della Maggiora, November 30 2007
- Re: RFPs and developers Larry Miller, November 30 2007
- Re: RFPs and developers Craig Ragland, December 2 2007
-
Re: RFPs and developers Paul L. Della Maggiora, November 30 2007
-
Automated External Defibrillator Muriel Kranowski, December 3 2007
- Re: Automated External Defibrillator Robert Heinich, December 3 2007
- Re: Automated External Defibrillator John Beutler, December 3 2007
- Re: Automated External Defibrillator Martie Weatherly, December 28 2007
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.