| Energy sources now and in the future | <– Date –> <– Thread –> | 
| 
	From: Brian Tremback (brian.tremback | 
|
| Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 18:07:47 -0700 (PDT) | |
Wayne Tyson: ""Biofuels" are only possible because of fossil energy 
inputs, now, and the basic con is that outputs exceed inputs. However, 
that is doubtful, and even the "calculations" made to justify this 
practice (which diverts agricultural space and products from food 
production, thus raising food prices, and increasingly lays waste to 
complex ecosystems) can claim only marginal net outputs in excess of 
inputs (like sugar-cane)."
Apologizing for continuing an issue mostly peripheral to cohousing, I couldn't resist adding my own concerns about biofuels. Cellulosic ethanol is commonly held out as a way to alleviate objections to diverting food crops from people to vehicles. What is typically ignored is that the so-called "waste" products that would be used for ethanol feedstock (eg. corn stover and wheat straw) is valuable for maintaining soil organic matter that is already usually well below optimal levels in agricultural soils, even those using organic practices. Because these crop residues reduce erosion, increase the soil's ability to hold fertilizers against leaching, increase infiltration/decrease runoff, decrease compaction, etc., we can expect degradation of farmland if this type of ethanol takes off.
Brian Tremback Burlington Cohousing East Village Burlington, VT<mailto:brian.tremback [at] burlingtontelecom.net>
- 
Energy Sources now and in the Future Norman Gauss, July 16 2011
- Re: Energy Sources now and in the Future Wayne Tyson, July 16 2011
 - 
Re: Energy Sources now and in the Future R Philip Dowds, July 16 2011
- Re: Energy Sources now and in the Future Wayne Tyson, July 16 2011
 
 
- Energy sources now and in the future Brian Tremback, July 16 2011
 
 
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.