a question about meeting minutes | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Muriel Kranowski (murielkvt.edu) | |
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 20:20:25 -0700 (PDT) |
I often take the minutes at our plenary meetings, and my minutes provide nearly verbatim accounts of what was said in the course of a discussion. I omit irrelevant and repetitive remarks and might simplify to a degree what each person said, but it's still a fairly detailed record of the meeting. My goal is that people not at the meeting, and people reading the minutes years later, will have a good understanding of the concerns and the issues and how they were addressed at that meeting, as well as the outcome if a decision was made. My question is, for those of you who take those kinds of minutes, do you cite who said each comment, or just show the comments? (Or if you don't do it yourself, if it's done this way in your community.) I have gone back and forth on this, sometimes thinking that the shyer people shouldn't feel constrained by knowing their name will be attached to all their remarks, and other times thinking that part of the record is who said what. I would love to know how you handle this and if there's anything controversial about however you do it, in your community. Muriel at Shadowlake Village, Blacksburg, VA
-
a question about meeting minutes Muriel Kranowski, September 8 2015
-
Re: a question about meeting minutes R Philip Dowds, September 9 2015
-
Re: a question about meeting minutes Muriel Kranowski, September 9 2015
- Re: a question about meeting minutes Sharon Villines, September 9 2015
- Re: a question about meeting minutes R Philip Dowds, September 9 2015
-
Re: a question about meeting minutes Muriel Kranowski, September 9 2015
-
Re: a question about meeting minutes R Philip Dowds, September 9 2015
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.