| Mutual accountability in cohousing — a practical question | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Kathryn Lowry (kathryn.lowry |
|
| Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2025 07:43:24 -0800 (PST) | |
Hi all, I’m writing with a question based on my experience at Daybreak Cohousing in Portland and how mutual accountability is understood in practice. Daybreak’s stated values define mutual accountability as including transparency and fairness in procedures and balancing individual and community needs. In practice, it’s often framed as “each person doing their equal part.” Currently, ice melt has been placed in containers outside every unit for individual use. I have not raised concerns about foreseeable risks (such as children accessing it), because the community has a long history of asserting that failure to keep children away from products labeled “keep out of reach of children” is a supervision issue, not a matter of community safety or shared design. That history includes a prior situation where concerns about toys in common areas, raised shortly after I had knee surgery, were met by discouraging collaborative solutions and escalating the matter through child welfare reporting rather than addressing it as a shared governance or accessibility issue. My questions are: - In cohousing, does mutual accountability mean parallel individual responsibility, or shared accountability for the outcomes of collective decisions about common spaces? - How do communities prevent “collective responsibility” from becoming individual blame when the group controls the system? I’d appreciate perspectives and examples from other communities. Best, Kathryn Lowry
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.