Re: sustainability | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Pablo Halpern (phalpern![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 93 10:45 CDT |
>There seem to me to be two distinct styles of cohousing, urban and rural. The >rural style seems a lot more to me like the commune concept than the urban >groups, who seem more interested in building a small-town type of community >while remaining close to their place of employment and other urban >attractions. The former, I think, are the ones really interested in >sustainable development. I don't think it's a good idea to automatically link idealogy to the urban v. rural v. suburban separation. Some of the emerging groups in the Boston area are more idealogical than our suburban group. For exampel, urban groups often have core ideals involving racial diversity, income diversity, or service to the surrounding community. Because of the close-quarters of the city, urban cohousing groups can potentially be more commune-like than rural ones. On the sustainability issue, many consider the ability to get to work via mass transit or walking to be a major issue in having a sustainable society. Also, as Jim has pointed out, urban groups can usually build cohousing without sacrificing open land, woodlands, or farms. Conversely, there is no reason why a rural cohousing group need by any more interested in sustainable developement than any other group wanting tyo live in community. The social and architectural principles of cohousing do not require solar energy or composting toilets. By living in detached houses, suburban cohousing groups can potentially require LESS work of their members than iff everyting, down to the wall, were shared with other community members. So, on balance, I think a group's idealogy, or lack thereof, is independent of whether that group prefers to be urban, rural, or in-between. If there is a pattern among EXISTING groups, however, that is a different story. Does anybody have evidence that rural groups, as a rule ARE more interested in sustainable developement? My anectotal evidence suggests otherwise. -- - Pablo ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Pablo Halpern (508) 435-5274 phalpern [at] world.std.com I am self-employed, so my opinions *do* reflect those of my employer. However, they may not reflect the opinions of my client. ------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
sustainability Judy, July 12 1993
- Re: sustainability apguirard, July 12 1993
- sustainability Judy, July 12 1993
- Re: sustainability Pablo Halpern, July 14 1993
- RE: Sustainability Buzz & Denise, January 19 1996
- Sustainability MartyR707, October 14 1996
- Sustainability Terri Hupfer, August 16 2002
- Re: sustainability HeidiNYS, September 18 2002
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.