Re: Gun policy in Cohousing community | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Robert Hartman (hartman![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 94 10:24:44 PST |
> Robert Hartman writes: > > > If the no-ban advocate is simply being ideological, I'd advocate > > outvoting him or educating him sufficiently to bring him around to a > > consensus. > > I like the way everybody assumes that in order to bring someone around > to their own position, it is simply necessary to "educate" them. > People can have the same information and come to different conclusions, > because their values are different. > > Andre Guirard I guess I did react a bit. The kind of obstinacy I heard about really bothers me. --perhaps because I've been that way so often and it was so alienating and miserable for me. The education I'm talking about isn't necessarily about guns. It's about recognizing the common values of the community. --it's about seeing the entire picture. Particularly in consensus, you just can't come to a good decision unless you take everyone's perspective into account. It may well be that someone expressing a minority view has an approach that would work better for the entire community. But coming into the discussion with an attitude of "I want what I want, and I have my rights, so there," just isn't going to work. That attitude prevents people from seeing the entire picture. Because that sort of it works so often in competitive environments, people often try to bulldoze within a community setting. When someone takes that tack, my sense is that the community cannot proceed to a decision until they are somehow pursuaded to take a more cooperative stance. And one way to do that is to confront the obstinacy head on. Reaching a consensus isn't about a competition of ideas. It's about blending ideas. It's about understanding everyone's viewpoint, including the person holding the minority view. But if that person is the one who refuses to recognize the desires, needs, fears, and views of others, their stance is problematic for everyone, including themselves. At that point, the issue of guns (or whatever) is secondary to the issue of attitudes. When people have to continue to live with each other, a cooperative attitude is a must. It's something that people often have to deliberately cultivate. Sometimes they may have to be "educated" about it. Personally, I wouldn't want to be involved in a cohousing community that didn't address this issue prior to moving in. I've been through too many struggles with consensus process ever to think that it comes naturally or that people take to it easily. Perhaps some do, but they are typically a distinct minority. -r
- RE: Gun policy in Cohousing community, (continued)
- RE: Gun policy in Cohousing community Nancy Wight, March 4 1994
- Re: Gun policy in Cohousing community Robert Hartman, March 4 1994
- RE: Gun policy in Cohousing community Rob Sandelin, March 4 1994
- Re: Gun policy in Cohousing community apguirard, March 6 1994
- Re: Gun policy in Cohousing community Robert Hartman, March 7 1994
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.