"Political" composition of cohousing groups | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Craig D. Willis (willic3![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 94 08:15 CDT |
>... find and agree on a housing site and buy or build houses together, >people must have similar mind-sets. > >On the other hand, I think it gets a bit dangerous to be living and hanging >out only with those of similar belief. Even before I saw Ray's response I felt a need to clarify what I said. The comments above make it obvious why. The attributes I have in mind when I say that I want to live in a community of like-minded people are: having a strong interest in truth, justice and personal growth (forgive the cliche, but at least I didn't say "the American way"), and be willing to talk about and stay open to new ideas as they try to make sense of the world around them. It is *that* desire (to *really* want to *try* to do this) that I see as an essential attribute of companions that I would really be *thrilled* about trying to create a community with. I definitely agree that cohousers are a *lot* more likely to have these qualities, but I also think that there could be (and are) a wide variety of reasons for why people get interested in cohousing. So I don't see it necessarily as a given. In fact, my experience is that almost *all* people have learned to become quite reticent (at the very *least*) about seriously delving into the nature of the reality around them, perhaps because there always seem to be so many more pressing problems to be dealt with. As I indicated in my previous post, I really don't care much about whether people are Republicans or Democrats or whatnot (or whether they even vote or not---dedicated voters are probably more naive than idealistic). Cynicism and disillusionment are the normal response to be expected given the political climate we live in, and I am truly admiring of anyone who is able to rise above that. I found Kevin Wolf's analysis of the political composition of N Street, and the "rent before buying" nature of their community very interesting. I wonder if other people in other groups would be willing to briefly describe the nature of their "membership" in this vein? It helps me to get a much better feeling for what the community is like (to the extent that a small amount of information can) and associates an individual character with a site (in this case, N street) that otherwise would remain pretty much anonymous in my mind, given that I can't easily associate all the individual comments that have come from each cohousing community member. Craig Willis willic3 [at] rpi.edu 518-477-4406
-
"Political" composition of cohousing groups Craig D. Willis, September 5 1994
- Re: "Political" composition of cohousing groups Hune Margulies, September 11 1994
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.