RE: Community & Architecture | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Gordon (weil![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 94 11:12 CDT |
Hello, I would like to throw 2 cents into the discussion on community and architecture. I find it extremely refreshing to hear Rob talk about co-housing communities that fail at creating a sense of community. It fills a void, a feeling of doubt that has nagged me since I first heard of Co-housing. Co-housing is an exciting idea, a wonderful opportunity for a new tradition of community. But if Co-housing does become a tradition of community, it will result from a focus on community and not on land acquisition and house construction. I agree with Rob. I also want to add that community can be a fragile thing that waxes and wanes. I live in a community that changes people more than a co-housing community would. But with all the changes that happen I know that community needs all the help it can get. It needs attention and nurturing, as Rob points out. It doesn't come out of just doing lots of work together. So much depends on the shared as well as the isolated understandings of the group. Many people don't grasp the fundamentals of cooperation, communication, and mutual support that intentional communities require. In spite of our emphasis on community, we find these people in our communities anyway. The strength of a community often depends on a few individuals who can model community for the rest. And the weakness of a community lies in those who are still growing into an understanding of community and human relationships. Every community has its weakness. Every community has its strength. Architecture can facilitate the strengths. Intelligent norms and social skills do much more. In my opinion a pervasive principle of personal growth is the best strength a community can have. In my own community we have a non-business meeting almost every month. There we talk about visions of the future, the strength of the community, improving our relationships, the state of our lives. These things get discussed informally anyway, but the attention we give to it during this one meeting each month helps to strengthen everyone's recognition of the importance of community. And those who are not part of the most vibrant core because they lack the time or the initiative or social acceptance get brought into those discussions during the meetings too. I think that it is important to make regular attempts like this to turn the collective attention onto the health of the community, exposing its strengths and weaknesses. - Gordon Weil Omega House
- RE: Community & Architecture, (continued)
- RE: Community & Architecture Rob Sandelin, October 19 1994
- RE: Community & Architecture shedrick coleman, October 19 1994
- RE: Community & Architecture Rob Sandelin, October 19 1994
- RE: Community & Architecture Rob Sandelin, October 19 1994
- RE: Community & Architecture Gordon, October 20 1994
- RE: Community & Architecture Jean Pfleiderer, October 20 1994
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.