RE: Community & Architecture | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Jean Pfleiderer (pfleiderer_j![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 94 11:41 CDT |
Rob Sandelin wrote: >Community is caring about each >other enough to offer service and support. Community is noticing that >your neighbors are getting ready to go on a trip, stressed out, and >making them dinner. Community is taking a crying baby so the mom can >get a break, without her even having to ask. Community is knowing that >your neighbors parents are coming, taking their kids to your house so >they can clean up the house. Community is coming home from work early >so you can help one of your neighbors by holding her hand on the way to >her cancer exam. Community is selflessly giving of yourself to others >because you want to help them be happy. It is about seeing and >understanding the needs of others and filling those needs. > >Group association is just being together, and just being together is >not community. You have to really care about each other to have >community. When you experience it, the difference is obvious. It's a >lot like love in that regard. You've just verbalized for me a lot of the difficulty I've been having with life at Nyland in the recent past. I'm beginning to suspect that we may have bitten off more than we could chew from the start, by building a brand new community with all the architectural and landscaping nightmares that implies. Now, years into our "cohousing experience," we are still in the build build build work work work mode. We have our architecturally designed spaces and our xeriscape, but in many of the ways you describe above, we still don't have a community. Many of us are still too caught between the "community work" that "must" get done and/or the guilt we feel if we aren't doing as much of it as we perceive we ought be, or resentment that someone else is not doing as much as we perceive they ought be, to stop for very long for the little pieces that make up real life. That's not to say it doesn't happen, just that it doesn't happen enough, and it isn't our focus as a group, our goal to make it happen. We seem poised right now at the beginning of a "reweaving" process that looks very much as though it is going to be about what committees we need to have and what expectations we ought have of how much each member of the community will participate on these committees--about accountability and responsibility, once again, but not about love and caring. Maybe, instead, there's something else we could be doing about "community"? You've set me to thinking. Thanks. Jean Pfleiderer PS: I for one won't mind if you speak on this subject again, even within the week!
- RE: Community & Architecture, (continued)
- RE: Community & Architecture shedrick coleman, October 19 1994
- RE: Community & Architecture Rob Sandelin, October 19 1994
- RE: Community & Architecture Rob Sandelin, October 19 1994
- RE: Community & Architecture Gordon, October 20 1994
- RE: Community & Architecture Jean Pfleiderer, October 20 1994
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.