RE: Community & Architecture | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rob Sandelin (robsan![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 94 18:04 CDT |
Ok, so I am possessed. Wanted to make one last point then I will go away for awhile: shedrick coleman said: > I wish to say that the architecture does play a part in the community. There are >plenty on examples where the architectural character has actually destroyed any >possiblity of group association. Group association is NOT community. Community is caring about each other enough to offer service and support. Community is noticing that your neighbors are getting ready to go on a trip, stressed out, and making them dinner. Community is taking a crying baby so the mom can get a break, without her even having to ask. Community is knowing that your neighbors parents are coming, taking their kids to your house so they can clean up the house. Community is coming home from work early so you can help one of your neighbors by holding her hand on the way to her cancer exam. Community is selflessly giving of yourself to others because you want to help them be happy. It is about seeing and understanding the needs of others and filling those needs. Group association is just being together, and just being together is not community. You have to really care about each other to have community. When you experience it, the difference is obvious. It's a lot like love in that regard. Rob Sandelin I promise not to say anything more about this for a week Sharingwood.
-
Community & Architecture Craig D. Willis, October 19 1994
- RE: Community & Architecture Rob Sandelin, October 19 1994
- RE: Community & Architecture shedrick coleman, October 19 1994
- RE: Community & Architecture Rob Sandelin, October 19 1994
- RE: Community & Architecture Rob Sandelin, October 19 1994
- RE: Community & Architecture Gordon, October 20 1994
- RE: Community & Architecture Jean Pfleiderer, October 20 1994
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.