Double Standards | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rebecca Dawn Kaplan (rebecca![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 95 09:19 CST |
Well, for the past several days there have been NUMEROUS posts on UU. Many of which have asserted than many/most members of various coho groups are UU, & others have suggested that people seekign to recruit for coho should look to UU groups, thus perpetuating the current skewing of membership. This discussion might lead many people to believe thatt they are not welcome in coho, from various perspectives. Although UU claims to be UNiversal, it really only is Universal with regard to many forms of christianity. If someone were practicing traditional Jewish religious practices, their practices woudl not be encompassed in UU, which, first of all, alsmot allways hold their "nondenominational services" on sundays. Additionally, many forms of pagan/wiccan practice are not encompassed by most UU groups. And yet, traditional religious christians of various denominations also condemn UU, believing that it is a flight from "real" christianity. Despite all of this, no one has proposed cutting the trumpeting of UU on this list in order to protect the image of coho. why? I suggest that it is because most people like UU, but don';t feel comfortable with polyamory. I raise this again because I think it is important to think carefully about what we are promoting here, because it is dishonest to say that we are not promoting anything. ALso, please note that what was originally objected to was *not* writing articles in public newspapers which implied that coho people were pro-polyamory, but rather, merely discussing polyamory on this list, which some "enemy" might see and use against us, somehow. I also want to point out that the responses that people have sent to me regarding my post (personally sent to me) contain contradictory justifications. One person insisted that compulsory monogamy does not really exist, that tehre are no realy social forces againt polyamory anyway, s so what do i have to be so riled up about. Another person said that I'd better be quiet about this, because Newt's armies are rallying at the gate, and will destroy us all if they even think that there might be some poly people in CoHo. So, which is it? It seems that whether people think this is Utopia or Armaggeddon, the message is still to shut up, which makes me think people are still profoundly uncomfortable with polyamory. But, if Newt's armies are at the gates, we'd better not takl about there being any queers here either, or unmarried couples living together in sin. -rebecca
-
Double Standards Rebecca Dawn Kaplan, February 1 1995
- Re: Double Standards David G Adams, February 1 1995
- Re: Double Standards Dale B. Walker, February 1 1995
- Re: Double Standards Catherine Kehl, February 1 1995
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.