Re. Housing Enmasse | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: OtisWalker (OtisWalker![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 95 08:46 CST |
I'm writing in response to Blake Cullimore's question about whether cohousing can work with 170 units on 25 acres. I think that this is the real challenge. Sure, we cohousers like to think of oursselves as rather independent neighborhoods within a larger community, self-sufficient and somewhat isolated, buffered by the open space that we have preserved around us from the surrounding ticky-tacky. I know many of us are concerned about not turning our backs on the larger community, though, and wonder how to integrate our little "village", both physically and socially, into the larger context. Now Blake has an opportunity in his design class to "build" such a context from scratch. Sure 170 houses could not form one cohousing community. But what about five? I know in Denmark they have tried large-scale, multi-community cohousing (see Dorit Fromm's book on Cooperative Communities) and it has not been as successful as small-scale, but maybe it has to be structured very differently. Or Blake could try several cohousing communities and some more conventional clustered housing, still sharing some kind of village center. But the point is, to be able to design communities that function well on their own and as pieces of a larger whole is very important for areas that may have to be more densely developed in the future. Meg
-
Re. Housing Enmasse OtisWalker, February 2 1995
- Re: Re. Housing Enmasse Lynne Farnum, February 2 1995
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.