Re: Respectability & poly-whatever [FWD] | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Fred H Olson WB0YQM (fholson![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 95 14:29 CST |
SAUNDERS [at] SYBASE.COM is the author of this message but due to a listserv problem it was posted by the COHOUSING-L sysop (Fred). **************** FORWARDED MESSAGE FOLLOWS ********************* > Inside the community: now, in the 1990's, with so many other aspects to > learn about living cooperatively, I'd tend to take fewer risks with elaborate > intimate relationships -- at least until the community is strong and > resilient. For now, isn't it enough to nurture deep friendships with your > fellow community members? Maybe learn to walk before becoming gymnists?? Hmmm...except, you are sort of discounting those people who are already polyamourous. And such people (myself included), I think, might have an at least slightly greater tendency to be interested in communitarian types of living. > Part of keeping one's life simple is having clear relationships. In 1995 > America, it seems that the cultural default is defined as I have sex with my > (current) partner and otherwise, I have close non-sexual relationships. > Rudimentary and simplistic, but pretty clear easy to follow. Again, it is not "clear and easy to follow" for a person whose "heart is polyamorous" (for lack of a better way to phrase it). Barbara
-
Re: Respectability & poly-whatever [FWD] Fred H Olson WB0YQM, February 3 1995
- Re: Respectability & poly-whatever [FWD] Fred H Olson WB0YQM, February 3 1995
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.