Re: The "lot" development model | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rob Sandelin (robsan![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 95 11:59 CDT |
My future neighbor Martin wrote: >Of course, cohousing groups could be organized around the purchase of the land, >leaving the houses to be the responsibility of each family, within certain >architectural guidelines, and on no particular schedule. Sharingwood was >organized this way. I would point out that there are 4 other cohousing groups organized, or are organizing this way in my area and it seems to be attractive, based on the high number of sold units. Having freedom to design and build your own home, to meet your own financial needs and personal tastes is a large attraction - we have gained a couple of members from other groups because of this. It is also much much easier for a group to design lots than to design houses. (I think - maybe after we have finished the phase 2 site design I won't think that anymore.) The difficult part of this form of development is ensuring adequate capital or other energy to develop the common elements, especially the commonhouse. Sharingwood was able to buy and develop our land in such a way that all the money coming from the sales of the second phase goes to building common elements. We did this by phasing in development over time, for example, we built 5 houses and had 13 committed members before we paved the road. We each paid $2,000 into a trust fund for a future commonhouse and used that trust fund to give loans to members who could not pay special development assessments right up front. Of the other 4 groups doing this model in our area, 2 are somewhat small and 3 of the groups have not figured out how to build a commonhouse. I am somewhat concerned that they will not be able to build a commonhouse at all and that is a bad situation which would very much effect those groups. I would encourage those groups who go to the lot model of development to focus your planning and design around a commonhouse first, a then design and build houses around it. Rob Sandelin Sharingwood
-
Re: The "lot" development model Rob Sandelin, April 4 1995
- Re: The "lot" development model Pablo Halpern, April 5 1995
- Re: The "lot" development model Rob Sandelin, April 5 1995
- Re: The "lot" development model Mac Thomson, April 10 1995
- Re: The "lot" development model Martin Tracy, April 10 1995
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.