RE: group formation and affordability | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rob Sandelin (robsan![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 95 11:21:41 PDT |
I agree with John that >The idea is that the lower the amount a household is able >to afford, (within reason,) the more affordable development strategies a >group will be willing to utilize. This is especially true if the lower- >and moderate-income members are somehow instrumental in the development >process. Another point of view about core group demographics. Another way of looking at the same thing from a different angle is that you make some trade-offs based on the lowest common income denominator. Some things, like windows for example, are often standardized in a development. The lowest common denominator then goes into effect whereas high quality windows are traded off for lower quality windows, in order to meet affordability goals. This trade-off is one of many, and what can happen, is even after all the tradeoffs are made, the lowest incomes can not afford it anyway and eventually move out of the project, leaving all those trade-offs in place. Often the longer and harder a person has invested in a project, the less they will face up to the financial realities that the costs are over their heads and not until mortgage or construction loan approval, do they actually face the realities and have to bow out. Of course at this point, all the trade-offs have been made, and those who are left in the project are stuck with them. If your development goal is primarily affordability then making all the tradeoffs that implies is important. However, if affordability is not a primary goal, then it would be well to talk with some local mortgage bankers, get an understanding of what their mortgage criteria are, then apply those in-house to your membership in some sort of private way, to evaluate individuals real ability to qualify for the mortgage on a unit. Be as realistic about this as you can. If a great person, who is a single teacher, with an income of $22K a year and no savings can't financially qualify for any projected units, the sooner everybody knows that the better. Either you can start looking for mortgage support programs early, or the person can realize that the reality of the dream of cohousing is out of their reach. I recognize that the last sentence above is great material for the "the capitalist system sucks" types of flame mails. Do us all a favor and rant your flame to me personally. Thanks Rob Sandelin Sharingwood
-
group formation and affordability REUER,JOHN PHILLIP,MR, June 7 1995
- Re: group formation and affordability Susan Johnston, June 7 1995
- Re: Re: group formation and affordability Harry Pasternak, June 7 1995
- RE: group formation and affordability Rob Sandelin, June 8 1995
- RE: group formation and affordability Willie Schreurs, June 8 1995
- RE: group formation and affordability Willie Schreurs, June 8 1995
- RE: group formation and affordability Sally S. Leach, June 13 1995
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.