Re: (1) D.I.Y's Lot Size | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: David Hungerford (dghungerford![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 95 16:30 CDT |
Harry's suggestions for how to design for community contain some reasonable ideas, but many run counter to my own experience. Also, The proscriptive tone of the post bugs me. The idea that it is not possible to have a community with flat roofs is absurd (I guess the entire Middle East and Mediterranean Coast is absent of "community"), Roofs over "verandas" are certainly important in rainy climates, but not in dry ones. And so on. Even Chrisopher Alexander, whose pedagogical "A Pattern Language" has so many strong pontifications about elements of good design, is humble enough to recognize that his suggestions should be part of an overall design PROCESS. During what seemed like years of design process (well, it actually WAS years), we learned that starting with "design solutions" was a mistake. Instead, programming and consensing uses, needs, visions, etc. into a set of "design criteria" allowed us to work with different designs until we had solutions that worked FOR US in our particular situation. (I must acknowledge Chuck and Katie here for their direction during that process---that's us in the 2nd edition of the cohousing book moving wooden blocks around on a site plan). Starting off with a proscriptive list like Harry produced can, IMHO, only get you in deep trouble. David Hungerford Muir Commons
-
Re: (1) D.I.Y's Lot Size Harry Pasternak, June 7 1995
- (1) D.I.Y's Lot Size TIM HEUSER, June 11 1995
- Re: (1) D.I.Y's Lot Size Harry Pasternak, June 12 1995
- Re: (1) D.I.Y's Lot Size David Hungerford, June 12 1995
- Re: Re: (1) D.I.Y's Lot Size Harry Pasternak, June 16 1995
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.