Re: Yawn, Pets-Their impacts | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Mark Ottenberg (mao![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 95 09:19 CDT |
On Mon, 19 Jun 1995, Rob Sandelin wrote: > Mark Ottenberg asked > Gee, I don't see what right there is for anyone to limit / restrict anyone > else's pets. > > Cats and dogs have large, negative impacts on native wildlife. We had > So, at least in rural areas, which have viable native wildlife > populations, there is very good reason to restrict pets. That is, if > you care about wildlife. > > Rob Sandelin > Naturalist and Forest Steward Gee, I guess so, but then I am a fan of "House Cats" and "Working" or "Companion Dogs" that are similarrly controlled and not allowed to roam free. I really don't see myself having any other kind, and as such, still wonder why someone else thinks they should be able to control the types / amount of my "house and yard" pets. (Gee, as usual, misunderstandings seem to come from a natural asumption that someone else is talking about the same thing that we are ... when we havn't even verified that yet ... :-) -- Mark
-
Re: Yawn, Pets-Their impacts Rob Sandelin, June 19 1995
- Re: Re: Yawn, Pets-Their impacts Collaborative Housing Society, June 22 1995
- Re: Yawn, Pets-Their impacts Mark Ottenberg, June 26 1995
- Re: Yawn, Pets-Their impacts Fred H Olson WB0YQM, June 27 1995
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.