| Re: Yawn, Pets-Their impacts | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Mark Ottenberg (mao |
|
| Date: Mon, 26 Jun 95 09:19 CDT | |
On Mon, 19 Jun 1995, Rob Sandelin wrote:
> Mark Ottenberg asked
> Gee, I don't see what right there is for anyone to limit / restrict anyone
> else's pets.
>
> Cats and dogs have large, negative impacts on native wildlife. We had
> So, at least in rural areas, which have viable native wildlife
> populations, there is very good reason to restrict pets. That is, if
> you care about wildlife.
>
> Rob Sandelin
> Naturalist and Forest Steward
Gee, I guess so, but then I am a fan of "House Cats" and "Working" or
"Companion Dogs" that are similarrly controlled and not allowed to roam
free. I really don't see myself having any other kind, and as such,
still wonder why someone else thinks they should be able to control the
types / amount of my "house and yard" pets. (Gee, as usual,
misunderstandings seem to come from a natural asumption that someone else
is talking about the same thing that we are ... when we havn't even
verified that yet ... :-)
-- Mark
-
Re: Yawn, Pets-Their impacts Rob Sandelin, June 19 1995
- Re: Re: Yawn, Pets-Their impacts Collaborative Housing Society, June 22 1995
- Re: Yawn, Pets-Their impacts Mark Ottenberg, June 26 1995
- Re: Yawn, Pets-Their impacts Fred H Olson WB0YQM, June 27 1995
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.