Re: Yawn, Pets-Their impacts | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rob Sandelin (robsan![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 95 16:09 CDT |
Mark Ottenberg asked Gee, I don't see what right there is for anyone to limit / restrict anyone else's pets. Cats and dogs have large, negative impacts on native wildlife. We had a wildlife biologist give us some information which was really eye-opening. Cats are major predators by their nature - they can not help it, they are evolved to kill things, whether they eat them or not. Suburban studies done in Bellevue, WA ( the closest study to Sharingwood - there are lots of other studies to quote from) showed that ground nesting birds (Rufous-sided towhees and CA qail were the study targets) were completely exterminated in the study area in three years by the 6 cats in a new subdividison. Small rodents, including chipmunks were also part of the study and showed similiar results. The biologist told me that pets have a greater impact on native wildlife than the buildings do. Dogs effect mammal migration paths by scent marking territory. Research on weasels, raccoons and another species which I forget showed that animals avoided dog scent mark areas, even when they involved prime food areas. The mammals simply abandoned the habitat due to the scent of dogs. This comes about from conditioning. Once an animal is attacked by any dog, it will remain wary of all dogs. A wild animal can not afford to be injured for very long, they have to forage daily, especially in winter, in order to survive. Pets live incredably pampered, well fed and cared for lives. Turned loose on the native wildlife, they become super predators. This is especially true in winter. Well rested, well fed, super predators which can destroy hundreds of animals a year and often do. If a dog jumps a raccoon at night, and both get equally chewed up, the dog gets a trip to the vets to clean up its wounds , the raccoon, which has to forage for its food, often dies from infection. Research done in England showed that the 40 cats in a small hamlet killed over 2,000 birds and mammals a year. And those were just the kills which were counted and the researchers estimated that they were only getting 20% of the actual kill counted!!!! So, at least in rural areas, which have viable native wildlife populations, there is very good reason to restrict pets. That is, if you care about wildlife. Rob Sandelin Naturalist and Forest Steward Sharingwood Cohousing
-
Re: Yawn, Pets-Their impacts Rob Sandelin, June 19 1995
- Re: Re: Yawn, Pets-Their impacts Collaborative Housing Society, June 22 1995
- Re: Yawn, Pets-Their impacts Mark Ottenberg, June 26 1995
- Re: Yawn, Pets-Their impacts Fred H Olson WB0YQM, June 27 1995
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.