Re: Re: PR for cohousing | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rob Sandelin (robsan![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 1995 20:06:46 -0500 |
Russell M wrote: > Ideas about how we live as a society, how we how we can rebuild the places we >work, raise our children, care for our elderly, these are issues that everyone has an >interest in, and these are the issues that will attract and sustain media >coverage of what we are trying to do. Last night I invested another hour in giving an interview and tour to yet another journalist. Her questions were clearly leading her theme that Cohousing is a very attractive and positive way of changing our society for the better. Who knows what she will actually write, but I really am glad that Russell summarized it as he did above, as this theme keeps coming out in all my evangelizing, I just don't summarize it well and the main point of cohousing is building a better way to live, which includes some architecture but is mostly people and their relationships. During the tour the journalist, who had been to Puget Ridge, said, "wow, you are so different from Puget Ridge, but its all the same thing!" I was tickled that she had figured it out that the architecture was not the point of cohousing. Now if we could only get some of the architects to figure that out........ Robsan
- Re: PR for cohousing, (continued)
- Re: PR for cohousing RAYGASSER, August 7 1995
- Re: Re: PR for cohousing Harry Pasternak, August 8 1995
- Re: Re: PR for cohousing Collaborative Housing Society, August 9 1995
- Re: PR for cohousing Greg Emil, August 10 1995
- Re: Re: PR for cohousing Rob Sandelin, August 10 1995
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.