RE: Stand Aside - Consensus - The Big Picture | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Mmariner (Mmariner![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 1995 02:53:55 -0500 |
As I understand it, from the folks who've been living with consensus decision making for quite some time, it's highly important that the whole group consense to a major direction, expressing fundamental values and a general direction the group wants to go in. After the direction is consensed upon, a group or an individual is empowered to make lots of small decisions about various purchases, etc., required to implement the group's consensus direction. For instance: Perhaps the group would consense to have community gardens and greenhouses farmed as sustainably and organically as possible within a certain amount of allocated funds. Then the committee (or individual) delegated to implement the gardens and greenhouses would make some decisions such as whether the purchase of a rototiller was a good investment and supported the goals consensed upon. I've heard it's counter-productive to try to consense upon all the minor details of any given project (thereby micro-managing and disempowering those responsible). Disclaimer: The above is theory. I have some experience in consensus decision making, but not in a coho community! Do other folks agree consensus should not be used in relatively low-level decisions, unless there is a huge passion of the group? Mike M
-
RE: Stand Aside - Consensus - The Big Picture Mmariner, August 21 1995
- RE: Stand Aside - Consensus - The Big Picture Eugene Ackerman, Ph.D., August 21 1995
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.