Re: Straw Building Material | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Shava Nerad (shava![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 1995 13:18:56 -0500 |
> One of the arguments for strawbale construction has always been that it > didn't have to go through industrial processes, with all the energy use for > treatment, handling and shipping that that implies. Once you go to all this > trouble, is straw really a good material, or are there better alternatives? > > I suspect the latter. But another argument for straw bale construction is that it could be a step in eliminating our dependencies on big timber. We don't *need* to build with wood, we just *do* because it's a cultural tradition, comforting, stylish, subsidized by the goverment, and a status symbol. Whereas wood *is* a good building material, our dependency on it as a major resource is destroying the last great forests in the world, including the old growth forests and great rainforest of the pacific northwest. Personally, I'd take something like gypsum board, made from straw, if it reduced the use of wood. So it isn't optimal, but it might be a good intermediate step. And if *someone* is making money off of it, it'll probably gain acceptance sooner, because someone will spend money to promote it... Shava Nerad shava [at] ns.uoregon.edu /* tree hugger...;) */
-
Straw Building Material Stuart Bonnema, October 12 1995
- Re: Straw Building Material J . Massengale, October 12 1995
- Re: Straw Building Material Shava Nerad, October 12 1995
- Re: Straw Building Material David B. Neeley, October 12 1995
- Re: Straw Building Material Eric Hart, October 12 1995
- Re: Straw Building Material Fred H Olson WB0YQM, October 13 1995
- Re: Straw Building Material Paul Zelizer, October 13 1995
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.