RE: Paid staff vs. volunteers | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rob Sandelin (Exchange) (Robsan![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 1995 11:18:32 -0600 |
In my experience there are some tasks that are so crucial you need to pay to get them done. For example, a project manager for the construction project is a full-time job and then some and in my opinion should be paid. Having part time volunteers to manage a construction project has potential for lots of very important things to get screwed up. At Sharingwood we have no requirements for participation and things still get done, albeit very slowly at times. Some people put in more time than others, in a cycle based on their lives and energy. For example my wife put in lots of energy as the general contractor for our commonhouse, and found that her home schooling duties required more of her time so that job got handed off to someone else who has the time. We have resisted trying to mandate monthly hourly contributions because the system we have used has worked out so far. If things fall apart from lack of energy then we will probably reconsider it. As it is people seem to accep t the fact that it takes us a LONG time to get some things done. This is tradeoff people are willing to make rather than have prescribed hours or other required participation. We did require the members of the second phase to contribute a yearly amount of hours to maintain their place in the lot selection que because we wanted those who put in the work to get lot selection preference over those who did not. The requirements are very minimal however and easily met, although those folks who live out of state may have trouble meeting the hourly requirements.
-
Paid staff vs. volunteers RAYGASSER, November 28 1995
- RE: Paid staff vs. volunteers Rob Sandelin (Exchange), November 29 1995
- RE: Paid staff vs. volunteers Stuart Staniford-Chen, November 29 1995
- Paid Staff vs. Volunteers Joani Blank, November 29 1995
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.