Re: Don't Have Two Cents | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Stuart Staniford-Chen (stanifor![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 1995 14:03:51 -0600 |
Bill Dean writes: > I have no trouble adapting to > the features I find in the buildings where I live or work, and have > rather be among those who would try to get something going at a > condoplex. > > I wonder if my attitude represents a tiny minority or is typical of > some potential cohousers. I've thought about this question quite a bit. I devote some of my spare time to various activities designed to promote people doing cohousing organically (ie converting existing structures gradually to cohousing). That's because I live in N St Cohousing which is 13 regular old suburban houses converted to a cohousing community over a period of 9 years (and still converting). If you don't know about us, check out our Web pages at http://seclab.cs.ucdavis.edu/cohousing/specific/n_street/ Anyway, my experience is that by the time people have identified to themselves that they would like to live in cohousing, they have bought into the idea that they can have "the perfect community". It will be all new and spiffy and they will get to design every last part of it *right*. Given this, they are generally luke warm about organic approaches - there is a certain unavoidable lack of control about doing things gradually, and things tend to be messy and uncertain to begin with. So, to a certain extent, I'm casting around for new markets to try and appeal to with this idea. I thought that maybe the intentional community movement would be a good place. However, it seems to me that a lot of those folks have already bought into a different dream - getting away from nasty bad civilization and living on a 1000 acres of beautiful land in the country. (I haven't given up though - the intentional community movement is very diverse, and there are a lot of communities of one urban co-operative house which potentially could grow). I'm wickedly thinking that burnt out ex-cohousers might be good people to educate about organic cohousing, since they still have the dream but are much more acutely aware of how hard the conventional process is. Building cohousing organically is really a lot less work! Honestly, it is. It's more uncertain and you have less control, but it is definitely less work. There are days when I wonder if we shouldn't just call ourselves something different altogether, write another book, and try to market the idea out to the public generally (I guess "Rebuilding Community in America" was basically trying to do this, though). Thank God it's Friday, Stuart. (going back to proposal writing now)
-
Don't Have Two Cents Bill Dean, December 8 1995
- Re: Don't Have Two Cents Stuart Staniford-Chen, December 8 1995
- Re: Don't Have Two Cents MelaSilva, December 9 1995
- Re: Don't Have Two Cents Kevin Wolf, December 10 1995
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.