Re: Women's Suffrage and Coho Membership | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: DCS (cdm![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 6 Jun 1999 07:37:07 -0500 |
Constructive criticism is always welcome. Bitner/Stevenson wrote: > > While I agree that the difference is nearly just a symbolic one, how we feel > about the decision making process directly affects the outcome. If people > feel they have less of a voice, they are more likely to block consensus-just > to be sure they can. I have seen this happen, though not recently, since we > trust each other pretty well now. > > I think it goes against the democratic tradition to have unequal votes. > Let's see... the only people who could vote hundreds of years ago were > landowning men. Sounds a little too close to the one house, one vote rule to > me. And what about the renter-serfs? > -- > Liz Stevenson > Southside Park Cohousing > Sacramento, California > > ---------- > >From: DCS <cdm [at] employees.org> > >Subject: Women's Suffrage and Coho Membership > >Date: Sat, Jun 5, 1999, 4:02 AM > > > > > However, now I believe that as seductive as the > > analogy is, it's not a very good fit given that our model of decision > > making doesn't even utilize a vote.
-
Women's Suffrage and Coho Membership DCS, June 4 1999
- Re: Women's Suffrage and Coho Membership Bitner/Stevenson, June 4 1999
- Re: Women's Suffrage and Coho Membership DCS, June 6 1999
- Re: Women's Suffrage and Coho Membership Becky Schaller, June 6 1999
- Re: Women's Suffrage and Coho Membership WOLF1GDSFM, June 6 1999
- Re: Women's Suffrage and Coho Membership Bitner/Stevenson, June 7 1999
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.