Re: Women's Suffrage and Coho Membership | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: WOLF1GDSFM (WOLF1GDSFM![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 6 Jun 1999 17:04:28 -0500 |
Becky Schaller wrote: << Should we start putting money away to fix the roof on the common house five or ten years from now? These kinds of votes are one vote for one household. Renters don't vote. The other kind of issues have to do with the day to day running of the community. How many meals should we cook and eat in the common house? Renters do vote on these issues. >> This is a reasonable approach. I am dismayed that this is being debated as a "Women's Suffrage" issue. As a single woman, I have saved (and rented) all my life (which is probably more than half over) until finally I was able to buy this unit. To put renters on equal footing with owners for expensive items which will have consequences for years to come could put me at a definite disadvantage, and I AM a woman. Renters can move away when the lease is up. Owners have to sell. I am not very experienced with this, but it appears that selling is usually quite a bit more difficult than moving to a different rental unit. It also seems that selling would be even more difficult if the unit were burdened with expensive long-term encumbrances. Those who will have to bear the brunt of the consequences should be those to decide. They can be women or men. This is not a women's suffrage issue. Jan Ankney Sunward Cohousing Ann Arbor, Michigan
-
Women's Suffrage and Coho Membership DCS, June 4 1999
- Re: Women's Suffrage and Coho Membership Bitner/Stevenson, June 4 1999
- Re: Women's Suffrage and Coho Membership DCS, June 6 1999
- Re: Women's Suffrage and Coho Membership Becky Schaller, June 6 1999
- Re: Women's Suffrage and Coho Membership WOLF1GDSFM, June 6 1999
- Re: Women's Suffrage and Coho Membership Bitner/Stevenson, June 7 1999
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.