Re: Women's Suffrage and Coho Membership | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Bitner/Stevenson (lilbert![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 1999 09:19:50 -0500 |
You did not understand the message, if you think I was writing only about women. It is NOT being debated as a women's suffrage issue. Go back and read more carefully. -- Liz Stevenson Southside Park Cohousing Sacramento, California ---------- > > I am dismayed that this is being debated as a "Women's Suffrage" issue. > As a single woman, I have saved (and rented) all my life (which is > probably more than half over) until finally I was able to buy this unit. To > put renters on equal footing with owners for expensive items which will > have consequences for years to come could put me at a definite > disadvantage, and I AM a woman. > > > Jan Ankney > Sunward Cohousing > Ann Arbor, Michigan >
- Re: Women's Suffrage and Coho Membership, (continued)
- Re: Women's Suffrage and Coho Membership Bitner/Stevenson, June 4 1999
- Re: Women's Suffrage and Coho Membership DCS, June 6 1999
- Re: Women's Suffrage and Coho Membership Becky Schaller, June 6 1999
- Re: Women's Suffrage and Coho Membership WOLF1GDSFM, June 6 1999
- Re: Women's Suffrage and Coho Membership Bitner/Stevenson, June 7 1999
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.