Arguments and Arguing | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharonvillines![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 07:56:38 -0600 (MDT) |
Thanks to Rob and Stuart for the nice long posts on dealing with conflict--I won't quote them. In the example presented, as I understand it, there were two people arguing with each other, presumably over an issue important to them. The rest of the group is bothered by the anger and the noise and the example for their children. I would suggest that this is the best situation for direct intervention. It isn't a general free for all and there are many cooler, less concerned heads around to help--reflect--support--clarify the issues. Waiting for everyone to cool off and do it later, loses the intensity of the moment and opportunity to really get at how the persons involved are feeling AND, even more important, misses the opportunity to demonstrate group support and caring. Having someone else take control not only helps work through an issue that the two people obviously cannot but it demonstrates that the two people can trust the group to help-support them. Again we are assuming that this is an argument and not a symptom of personality disorder or deep denial. Confronting denial doesn't seem to work (understatement). Sharon.
-
Arguments and Arguing Sharon Villines, August 25 1999
- Re: Arguments and Arguing Bitner/Stevenson, August 25 1999
- Re: Arguments and Arguing Victoria, August 25 1999
- Arguments and Arguing Sharon Villines, August 26 1999
- Re: Arguments and Arguing Sharon Villines, August 26 1999
- Re: Arguments and Arguing Unnat, August 26 1999
- Re: Arguments and Arguing Sharon Villines, August 26 1999
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.