Re: Defining "the cohousing principle" | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Berrins (Berrins![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2000 23:15:56 -0700 (MST) |
The responses to Anthony's comments RE: owner involvement in the development process have been great (esp., as usual, Rob's), and should be brought together and sent out to all new groups. Any volunteers? Two thoughts: 1) Being your own developer gives you the experience of running a large project together (although I highly recommend getting a development coordinator to help guide you through the process). Once you are done, you will be better able to coordinate and perform the day-to-day operations of a condo association. There is no teacher and community builder like experience. 2) While many cohousing groups are in existence or in development, we are still but a tiny, tiny percentage of new housing or retrofit housing neighborhoods being built. "Traditional" suburban sprawl or condo developments are still the norm. Very few architects, landscape architects, contractors and town planning boards have experience with cohousing. They may have heard of it, but have very little hands on experience. In most cases, the folks developing the community will have the most knowledge about cohousing, even if it's mostly theoretical. Don't expect your contractor or town planning boards members to educate themselves about cohousing. They are expecting the future community members to do that. Therefore, in order for the future physical structure to best enhance and foster cohousing community ideals and any specific needs of the future community, the folks who want to live there will want to be deeply involved in the physical design process. Here's an example: We are in the middle of move-ins at Pathways, which means we are living in a construction site. Right now the grounds alternate between mud and dust. We are hoping to get some plant life soon (grass, ground cover and ornamental plantings). However, the contractor and virtually all the subs have no experience with cohousing (fortunately, our architects and development coordinator all live in nearby Pioneer Cohousing, but they aren't involved with the landscaping). As of right now, as I understand it, the contractor is simply going to let the landscapers come in and "do their thing," which in all likelihood will be typical condo-style individual home plantings. Yuck AND muck. We are attempting to entice a land arch grad student from UMass to take us on as a project. To do this we will have to pry some budget money away from the project budget and then gain some control over the landscape design process. I don't know if any cohousing group has done this before (if you have, let me know how you did it!). If we are successful and get an integrated, well-thought out landscape design, the quality of cohousing community life will be that much better. It definitely won't happen if we aren't involved in the design process. Roger Berman Pathways Cohousing Northampton, MA (we closed yesterday and move-in April 1st; Oy!)
- Re: Defining "the cohousing principle", (continued)
- Re: Defining "the cohousing principle" Dave Busse, March 25 2000
- Re: Defining "the cohousing principle" Jose Marquez, March 25 2000
- Re: Defining "the cohousing principle" Fred H. Olson, March 25 2000
- RE: Defining "the cohousing principle" Rob Sandelin, March 25 2000
- Re: Defining "the cohousing principle" Berrins, March 25 2000
- Re: Defining "the cohousing principle" Lydia & Ray Ducharme, March 28 2000
- Re: Defining "the cohousing principle" vbradova, March 29 2000
- Re: Defining "the cohousing principle" Maggi Rohde, March 29 2000
- RE: Defining "the cohousing principle" Lashbrook, Stephan, March 29 2000
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.