Re: Defining "the cohousing principle" | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Jose Marquez (marchpower![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2000 15:47:28 -0700 (MST) |
> Anthony Cooke wrote: > > "We know how to design neighbourhoods to foster community now. We don't > need resident participation in design. ... > > "We need to throw away the idea of the future owners/renters of cohousing > communities having to be their own designers, and therefore, developers. > These myths are a huge millstone around the neck of cohousing as a > movement. I didn't read Anthony's entire message. That said, isn't it the ultimate in hubris to believe that the desires of one person with "certain experiences" will meet the needs of other unique individuals? I don't recall every early human culture being built the same way? The world has wonderful examples of thousands of different ways of living together...successfully! These communities were created by the community members that lived there and affected their living condition. I wonder if the myth is that a community needs to be "finished" before you all "move in?" Let's go build it, then we'll move in and enjoy it. What's so terrible about experiencing the creationary process together? If it is stressful, that is a reflection of our current society and it's pressures to move faster and faster....the people of the past had a slower life. It's the process that matters in every valuable thing...."raising" the children, "nurturing" the garden, "designing" the home, "building" the community, "meeting" people, etc. Sometime, too, the harder things in life are the more important things. If I spend 4 years with people creating a community, then I'm truly prepared to live with these people. I truly KNOW these people. I'm more likely to know that this is the right place for me and my family and I'm more likely to stick around because my decision will be a more informed one. If you skip the difficult pre-move-in experiences (like a honeymoon stage in a relationship) you move in and are suddently blown away (perhaps) by the difficulties of doing real stuff together....assigning chores, dealing with disagreements, etc. So, how can we decide what hardships are okay to experience and which hardships we want to "avoid?" Anyway...not the most organized message, but I tried. ;-> March
-
Defining "the cohousing principle" Anthony Cooke, March 24 2000
- Fwd: Defining "the cohousing principle" Zimmerland, March 25 2000
- Re: Defining "the cohousing principle" Dave Busse, March 25 2000
- Re: Defining "the cohousing principle" Jose Marquez, March 25 2000
- Re: Defining "the cohousing principle" Fred H. Olson, March 25 2000
- RE: Defining "the cohousing principle" Rob Sandelin, March 25 2000
- Re: Defining "the cohousing principle" Berrins, March 25 2000
- Re: Defining "the cohousing principle" Lydia & Ray Ducharme, March 28 2000
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.