RE: Forms of ownership: how it can work out selecting members selling condos | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rob Sandelin (floriferous![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2000 09:21:55 -0700 (MST) |
How a cohousing community overcame a foreclosure by a loan shark Once upon a time, in a community far in the NW, a couple of people joined a community and built their dream home. Well actually they got it mostly built. They were not very honest, either with the community nor with themselves, and had several other problems besides this. Eventually, in order to finish out their home, they took a high interest loan from a "loan shark", because they could get no other financing. They then spent the money on other things besides their house and did not make the loan payments. They were foreclosed upon by the loan shark and evicted. Not one word of any of this was said to the community in which they lived. One Sunday, two large moving vans pulled up, loaded up, and left. The couple owed some of the community members several thousands of dollars which remains uncollected to this day. The loan shark hired a crew to bring the house, which was by legal definition a condo unit, up to final inspection and then hired a realtor who had no idea what was happening. Again, no communication with the community was done, and a very misleading ad was placed in the Sunday real estate section. The first the community heard about it was when cars started driving up asking about the real estate. Oh my! The community members rallied, and created an emergency task force which met and talked with every single person who showed up that day and beyond. They made a large sign, and also a brochure handout was placed directly in front of the house, on community property which explained the community. The Realtor was not happy, and after a couple of unpleasant exchanges with community members, the realtor called the loan shark and dropped their contract selling the house. The emergency task force met with the loan shark, explaining that this home which he had acquired was not a normal real estate deal, in fact was part of a community, etc. etc. To his credit, he hired a much more savvy and smart realtor to sell the house. She contacted the task force, got all the details about the community, created a handout and description which included this and tried to market it. With no success. Traditional Real estate means did not work. After 3 months, the realtor offered to split the commission if the community marketed the house and found a buyer. The price of the house dropped to make it a non-profit deal for the loan shark, he just wanted his money back at this point. The community agreed, and moved from a place of trying to block the deal to one of trying to make the deal and started doing a bit of call down to their guest lists and visitor logs. There was a quick response and five days later a buyer signed the purchase contract. The buyer was completely excited about the community, lukewarm about the house, but bought the house in order to have the community. So what you are and what you do as a community will filter out people who are disinterested if you approach it the right way, e.g. give them full information about the community, its work together, the expectations for involvement, its mission, etc. None of these things are "Legally" binding, but they are a powerful filter which guides the right people to buy your homes. Even if the seller does not want to disclose this info, the community can. In fact, most condo laws in most states require the condo association to provide the buyer with the house agreements and other pertinent documents. So you do select your members, even if you don't have the legal right to, just by being a community and doing the things that you do. The biggest filter factor this community discovered was community dinner. Mere mention of that sent people away quickly, or intrigued them to the point of actually coming and hanging out. I guess something over 100 people came to see the house, maybe two had enough interest in community to even consider it briefly. So the marketplace for community homes a very different from that of non-intentional neighborhoods. A technical aside, actually most cohousing homes are owned by banks, not the members anyway, and these absentee owners are usually very clueless about cohousing. Its usually just another condo development to them. (As another aside, I personally have never like the term "unit". So I use the term Home to describe cohousing dwellings) Rob Sandelin Community Works! Consensus and community building workshops for social change non-profit groups Sharingwood resident
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.