Re: Rules vs No Rules | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Berrins (Berrins![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 22:34:26 -0600 (MDT) |
In a message dated 8/15/2000 11:45:32 AM, sharonvillines [at] prodigy.net writes: << > All human beings who are interacting with each other have rules for their > relating. The only question is whether the rules are overt or covert. > > If the rule is no rules, that's still a rule. Exactly. And covert rules establish dictatorships much more often than overt rules. Sharon. >> "Covert" rules also generate a lot of friction when some folks don't follow what others thought were rules. You don't have to create a written rule to solve every disagreement, but if you notice some trends, then maybe you need to come up with some rules, or at least some guidelines. -Roger
- RE: Rules vs No Rules, (continued)
- RE: Rules vs No Rules Rob Sandelin, August 15 2000
- Re: Rules vs No Rules Fred H Olson, August 15 2000
- Re: Rules vs No Rules Michael D, August 15 2000
- Re: Rules vs No Rules Catherine Owen, August 16 2000
- Re: Rules vs No Rules Berrins, August 17 2000
- Re: Rules vs No Rules Sharon Villines, August 18 2000
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.