Re: Re:common house as public building | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Elizabeth Stevenson (tamgoddess![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 10:37:01 -0600 (MDT) |
Hey, don't get snippy, you! ;) I thought you were talking about the law when you said "must". I completely agree that accessibility is paramount. Had I been involved in the decision making process when it was designed, I would have insisted on an elevator. -- Liz Stevenson Southside Park Cohousing Sacramento, California tamgoddess [at] home.com http://members.home.net/southsideparkcohousing ---------- > Well Liz that's exactly the point. You can have as many stories in your CH > as you want but if they're not accessible to everyone in the community you > can't use the space. So other than storage and I'm not even sure about that > really -- what would be the point of building a multi story building UNLESS > you plan to adapt it in the future. Which I'm sure is what a lot of > communities do to save money. I just wonder how long the space is unusable? > > Ann Zabaldo _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
- Re: Re:common house as public building, (continued)
- Re: Re:common house as public building Ann Zabaldo, April 17 2001
-
Re: Re:common house as public building Elizabeth Stevenson, April 17 2001
- Re: Re:common house as public building Ann Zabaldo, April 17 2001
- RE: Re:common house as public building Lashbrook, Stephan, April 17 2001
- Re: Re:common house as public building Elizabeth Stevenson, April 17 2001
- Re: common house as public building Lynn Nadeau, April 17 2001
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.