Conference Notes Part 1 | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: pattymara (pattymara![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 22:26:02 -0600 (MDT) |
Dear List, I finally got my notes typed up. In this post I included notes from Eric Utne's opening speech, and one session: "Facilitation in the Fire". North American Cohousing Conference, Berkeley 2001 Notes by Patty Mara Gourley Opening Presentation by Eric Utne: ?Changing the World and Yourself by Creating Community? For 99% of human history on earth, we have lived in tribes of 12 - 36 people. For the full flowering of the human spirit, humans needed to live in small groups-tribes or villages. It was only in times of war that the nuclear family group prevails, because it is the most mobile unit. (Margaret Mead) Eric sees our task as ?finding, feeling and following our heart?. Rudolph Steiner: ?The central task in this century is community: learning to see another?s pain as one?s own.? Qualities of heart needed for community living: patience, generosity, humbleness, good temper, sincerity, courage, stamina. In community one has to accept the whole package: both the light and the shadow. You don?t get a line item veto. Eric suggests that if we want to make a change in our culture or our country, a very powerful stance is to ?act as if it were already so.? The ?acting as if? creates a powerful cumulative effect, and change happens. Facilitation in the Fire: Finding Consensus When the Heat is On. Presented by Laird Shaub and Tree Bresson The session opened with the suggestion that we do a role play to demonstrate a meeting with a difficult issue: creating a Pet Policy in community. 12 volunteers were given slips of paper that described the person they were supposed to portray. My paper read: ?Mauer- wandering off topic frequently, nice person, but unfocused.? Three other volunteers were chosen to take turns facilitating the meeting. . As the facilitators ran the discussion, Laird and Tree would take notes, make comments and sometimes suggest another approach. We had a great time playing our roles. It became clear that some of the other roles were: the pet lover, the poop hater, the noise sensitive, the linear thinker, the feeler, the animal rights activist, the ?let?s cut to the chase and stop all this whining? guy. I took great pleasure in playing my role because it is one of my pet peeves when someone diverts the discussion by wandering off topic. The facilitators all handled me gently but firmly, keeping the discussion on topic. It was remarkable how this exercise brought up all the familiar issues around pets in community that we have spent time on in the past. It offered good modeling for those who haven?t moved into their community yet. Some of the interesting facilitation nuggets: Good facilitation is about disagreeing constructively. How do we disagree and have it work? After a circle check, summarize all the comments. What do we do with feelings? Make agreements on a community level about what to do with feelings. They cannot be ignored. Based on these agreements, the facilitator can respond to the feelings when they come up in meetings. It was remarkable how this exercise brought up all the familiar issues around pets in community that we have spent time on in the past. It offered good modeling for those who haven?t moved into their community yet. Some of the interesting facilitation nuggets: Good facilitation is about disagreeing constructively. How do we disagree and have it work? After a circle check, summarize all the comments. What do we do with feelings? Make agreements on a community level about what to do with feelings. They cannot be ignored. Based on these agreements, the facilitator can respond to the feelings when they come up in meetings. A good facilitator is Everyone?s Ally. When feelings flare up, acknowledge them, don?t skate over them in an attempt to keep the business discussion going forward. Take 60 seconds to diffuse the feelings by acknowledging and naming them, perhaps paraphrasing the feelings, and check to see if the person feels heard. By ?hearing? the feelings of one person, you also create an alignment with the others in the room who may be silently agreeing with the person expressing feelings. The task of the facilitator at this point is to Insist on Staying On Topic. Ask: What information came out of the feelings that were expressed? Then move forward on the topic. When sarcasm is used in group discussions, trust is lost. Avoid sarcasm. Check in on personal boundaries during the course of discussions. Ask the group and individuals if appropriate ?Are you comfortable with this?? Beware of polarities: this OR that. Don?t create or assume polarities in the group. A good facilitator reflects the common ground of the issue over and over and over. Find and reflect the common ground to diffuse polarities, and move closer to agreements. Be careful about approaching problems with just a linear view. Often a linear approach can shut down creative energy. Use tools like: 1. Assign a scribe to write on a pad or board which everyone can see. Record the points of discussion so there is a visual record of what people say. People learn and process information differently. Provide multiple access to information. In discussions we depend on VERBAL framing, but it is also useful to add a VISUAL framing by using a scribe. Also, by writing down points of information, or feelings, or observations made, individuals will feel more ?heard? when their point is made ?visible? by the scribe. 2. If the group is large and the issue is hot, break up into small groups, where it provides everyone with the chance to speak in a safer, smaller arena. Then the small groups report back to the large group. Discussion continues from there. 3. Take breaks in the meeting to stretch and release energy. 4. Pause to breathe. Some groups have a 5 second pause between each comment to let it sink in. Breathe. 5. Strive to create heart connections during meetings. Remember that it is a RATIONAL act to acknowledge feelings. (Heart Math tidbit: 60-65% of the cells of the human heart are neuron cells, operating just like the neurons of the brain, with synapses and electrical ?brain? wave fields.) 6. At the end of a discussion, or a general meeting, make assessments. End the meeting with a positive evaluation, see the glass half full, rather than half empty. If agreements were not reached, highlight Partial Products. What partial agreements were made that bring the group farther along the road to consensus? What are we closer to? What are the loose ends that still need attention? 7. Debriefing. The facilitation team can help each other by debriefing one another after meetings to help hone skills. ________________________________________________________________ GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.