RE: giving and taking | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Diane R. Margolis (diane![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2001 15:39:02 -0600 (MDT) |
If the tone of my response to Molly?s email was out of line, I am truly very sorry. I did not intend to hurt anyone?s feelings. I hope you will forgive me. Questions of entitlements and/or gratitude are ones about which I feel very deeply and these feelings apparently got the better of me. Like Molly, I was expressing my feelings?or trying to. My hope was to clarify why I feel that education is an entitlement for which it would be inappropriate to express gratitude. I want to try again. Molly says in her later emails that she wanted to discuss feelings of entitlement and that the example she used of education was perhaps ill chosen. But the whole point is in the examples at least the point I was trying to make is that Molly?s examples were like apples and oranges. We ARE entitled to some things, like education, and not to others, like gifts. If a community decides that its children should be educated, then all kids are ENTITLED to an education. As far as education is concerned, these are the community?s children, not the parents?. Industrialized nations educate their children in order to be industrialized, or modern. It has nothing to do with giving gifts to parents who, as somebody on the list pointed out, have no choice in the matter. Education is compulsory. Parents do not benefit from public education any more than non-parents do, which is why parents act as though kids are entitled to an education. Similarly, in cohousing, some communities pay for child care ? not all the time, but just during meetings. We do this, not as a gift to the parents, but because we want the parents? participation in the meeting. If anything, we should not take the parent?s participation as something the group is entitled to and we should say thanks to the parents who give up precious time with their kids in order to share in the work of the community. In both cases, we are pooling ? we think of the kids as America?s kids, or coho kids, they are OURS, not their parents? in this sense, and the money to pay for the education comes from taxes, a pool of resources that citizens draw from according to their needs. A sense of entitlement is very appropriate when we are pooling. A sense of entitlement is not appropriate when we are exchanging gifts. Molly, gave another example that is as different from public education as the moon is from the sun. I?m referring here to the person who sends out pages from catalogues to let people who intend to give her gifts know what she wants. From what Molly said, it does seem that this person is in a gift relationship with Molly, and, according to the way gift exchanges are supposed to work, she is behaving very badly indeed. No one is ever entitled to a gift. Gifts are the outward manifestation of various kinds of relationship. Grace?s example of the friend who loaned or gave her money is a perfect example of a gift relationship working well. They are friends, they?ve known each other for quite some time, the friend did not wait for Grace to ask directly, she made the offer. Grace, of course, said ?thank you,? but she did not make too much of it, that would have embarrassed her friend. Some day, Grace may give or loan her friend money; she has probably already given much of equal or greater value. The whole nature of a gift is that it puts pressure on the receiver to reciprocate in some fashion. Often reciprocation is linear rather than circular. Driver A lets driver B in line and, a little later, driver B lets driver C in. That?s what civility is all about. Maimonides, a Hebrew scholar in the 12th century, wrote an oft-quoted rubric of charity from the highest to the lowest. It works pretty well for gifts of all sorts. ________ There are eight levels of charity each greater than the next. The greatest level, above which there is no other, is to strengthen the name of another? by giving him a present or loan, or making a partnership with him, or finding him a job in order to strengthen his hand until he need no longer beg from people 2. Below this is the one who gives charity to the poor, but does not know to whom he gives, nor does the recipient know his benefactor? 3. Below this is one who knows to whom he gives, but the recipient does not know his benefactor?. 4. Below this is one who does not know to whom he gives, but the poor person does know his benefactor. 5. Below this is one who gives to the poor person before being asked. 6. Below this is one who gives to the poor person after being asked. 7. Below this is one who gives to the poor person gladly and with a smile. 8. Below this is one who gives to the poor person unwillingly. _______ I guess the first level is public education and the second is pooling in general. Rob talks about the giving in community. The more there is of giving the deeper and better the relationships. My guess is that that is less because of expressions of gratitude, and more because receivers feel a need to pass the gift along. In some ways, a gift is like a hot potato. I?ve gone on too long. But still I want to try to clarify one more point. Andrea took as an attack on Molly my reference to the Taliban. I was not by the longest shot comparing Molly to the Taliban. I WAS trying to describe the enormous variation among gift exchange systems. The Taliban would like to wipe out modern markets, and the pooling of the modern state and revert instead to one of the most repressive hierarchical gift exchange systems known to man. Each system does some things well and some badly. If you try to do everything according to any one of these systems, your society is sure to fall apart. Our discussion is about which goods and services are best exchanged in markets as commodities, which are best exchanged as gifts, and which are best pooled. IMO education works best when it is pooled. Again, I am sorry my last message seemed like an attack. I hope this one does not. But, if I have once more transgressed, please let me know and I will try to express my feelings and thoughts in less offensive ways. Diane. _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
-
giving and taking Andrea Schulz, October 3 2001
- RE: giving and taking Diane R. Margolis, October 5 2001
- Re: giving and taking Kay Argyle, October 12 2001
-
RE: giving and taking Becky Schaller, October 6 2001
- RE: giving and taking Diane R. Margolis, October 7 2001
- re: giving and taking don i arkin, October 7 2001
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.