Conflict | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 08:13:01 -0600 (MDT) |
> In response to a communication > to the group by a particular individual outlining what I considered to be > unilateral changes, that added to the number and complexity of the home > types, I opened fire on this person, calling him self-interested and said I > was insulted by the transparency of his argument for the changes. Never question motives or characterize anything. Stick to your feelings and desired outcomes. One reason to share information is that then you are not the only person in the group who sees the issues the way you see them. I'm one of those people who are not intimidated by conflict and believe that resolution of conflict is healthy. Most people would much prefer the bad outcome with no confrontation to the resolution with confrontation. > I want the group to be able to hold the conflict and face up to the both the > emotional intensity and the content of disagreements. I agree with Sharon > that my relationship is with the group, and I want conflicts to be handled > by the group. One thing I have learned about the group is that dealing with conflicts with individuals does get dealt with by the group because "the word gets around." When an individual won't deal with me directly, I enlist the help of a third person who can often sort things out quickly and efficiently with less discomfort. Basically, you don't have a group yet. I didn't realize you were still in the design phase when you posted the first post. This is very early in the process. The group will not feel strong enough to support your strong feelings. No one has any idea what they are doing now. They are still learning and feeling their way. Clarifying goals and asking questions is the best way to work through this. Pizza and beer will work wonders also. As one of my troubleshooters here says, "When you (meaning me specifically) bring food to a meeting it goes better." She means that when I've fed people, they get less upset when I insist on raising the issues no one wants to discuss. Sharon -- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
- Re: Confidentiality and conflict, (continued)
-
Re: Confidentiality and conflict Sharon Villines, October 7 2001
-
Re: Confidentiality and conflict Elizabeth Stevenson, October 7 2001
- RE: Confidentiality and conflict Eileen McCourt, October 7 2001
- Confidentiality -- Sharing Information Sharon Villines, October 8 2001
- Conflict Sharon Villines, October 8 2001
-
Re: Confidentiality and conflict Elizabeth Stevenson, October 7 2001
-
Re: Confidentiality and conflict Sharon Villines, October 7 2001
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.