Cohousing-L Mailing List: RE: Cohousing-L digest, Vol 1 #251 - 9 msgs

[Ruddick, T.R. (RUDDICK]

Liz wrote:

>On the contrary, Don. Everyone involved has posted ad nauseum, and still
the
>misunderstandings, meanderings and posturings remain. Who is more correct?
>Who cares more about children? Who can get in the last word? Blah, blah,
>blah.

Since I am on digest, I had not read the above comment before posting:

>I was in danger of misinterpreting your remarks, thanks for clarification.
>Your follow-up thoughts on this issue are provocative and will get me
>thinking for a few days.

I wanted to confirm here that I was NOT posting the above in order to
contradict Liz's rant about misunderstandings that haven't gone away.
Although, quite obviously, it also had that effect.

Liz, just because a post doesn't contain the word "cohousing" doesn't mean
it's not relevant to the topic or helpful to many.  If the discussion
irritates you--and I'm sure many will--I don't know the cure.  But
generally, I would prefer that "off-topic" pronouncements come from the
moderator, or else that they be worded a little more conditionally and
cordially.
_______________________________________________
Cohousing-L mailing list
Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org  Unsubscribe  and other info:
http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l