Re: Sliding Scales & Memberships | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 18:36:01 -0600 (MDT) |
Firstly I should say that we are new at this so "what we do" is anyone's guess. A sure guide to starting an argument is saying "we do this for this reason." > Are renters not contributing to the maintenance because they don't want to, > or because they're not members? And when you say renters, do you mean > people who have the lease on a house, or people who are sharing a house with > an owner or member/renter. Everyone pays a basic 'condo fee'. Roommates are covered under the owners maintenance fee. Everyone pays for meals. But we consider cooking a part of the workshare -- meals are not limited to people who cook. Anyone can cook. Anyone can eat. But we also have laundry facilities, exercise room, kids room, hot tub, office with a computer, high quality printer, and a copy machine. We will eventually have a well stocked workshop/crafts room. These things require a lot of work to organize, equip, maintain, and monitor. Just cleaning the common house takes at least 18 Saturday people hours every two weeks with fill-ins during the week. Scheduling the two guest rooms is no cake walk. Should renters, who do no work, be able to use the facilities freely? And bring their guests? I'm actually better acquainted with one renters parents than I am with him because they use the guest rooms and the commonhouse when they are in town and he is at work. I'm not sure I would even recognize him in a crowd. We do have (or are wordsmithing) a non-owner resident membership that obligates people to the same expectations of members -- to be informed, to contribute work, to participate in community activities. Largely un-enforced but enforcement hasn't been necessary. The question is do renters have to sign it to use the facilities in the same way a member does or are they limited to using them as a guest -- at the express invitation of a member. >There's no expectation placed on these > people - we're big on 'rights' here (grrrr) - however I would feel very > disappointed if they didn't respond to contribute to a major work project, > for example. We also have lovers and lodgers. What I'm afraid of the grrrrrrr. I would rather address the issue and be sure we understand what we are getting into rather than "taking privileges away" later. > However, privately owned houses are only rented to people who want to be > part of the community life. We don't have this requirement. People are fairly in agreement about this ( I think -- don't quote me). We would like them to participate but owners didn't want their options limited if they were reassigned for a year or two. (We have National Guard and Army people, for example.) In fact we have so many people on the waiting list and people sharing who would like to rent a whole unit that I doubt if this will ever be a problem. Sharon -- Sharon Villines sharon [at] takomavillage.org Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
-
Sliding Scales & Memberships Sharon Villines, October 18 2001
-
Re: Sliding Scales & Memberships Robyn Williams, October 19 2001
- Re: Sliding Scales & Memberships Sharon Villines, October 19 2001
-
Re: Sliding Scales & Memberships Robyn Williams, October 19 2001
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.