Re: Revisiting consensus decisions | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Elizabeth Stevenson (tamgoddess![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 10:55:01 -0600 (MDT) |
> BTW, we always recommend that participation (and therefore voting) be by > individual, rather than by household. This is consistent with the consensus > process which empowers all individuals equally. > > Community decisions should, IMHO be open to evolution. > > > Chris ScottHanson I agree, in principle, but after move-in, to make legally binding decisions, be sure there is a quorum of households represented. -- Liz Stevenson Southside Park Cohousing Sacramento California http://members.home.net/southsideparkcohousing/ tamgoddess [at] home.com _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
- RE: Re: Revisiting consensus decisions, (continued)
- RE: Re: Revisiting consensus decisions Rob Sandelin, October 21 2001
-
Re: Revisiting consensus decisions Dave Crawford, October 18 2001
- Re: Re: Revisiting consensus decisions Elizabeth Stevenson, October 18 2001
-
Revisiting consensus decisions Fred H Olson, October 24 2001
- Re: Revisiting consensus decisions Elizabeth Stevenson, October 24 2001
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.