Re: Re: the importance of clearly defined process & power | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Maggi Rohde (maggi![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2002 21:29:05 -0700 (MST) |
On Sat, 2 Feb 2002, Ed Stauff wrote: > Everyone empowered to make decisions on behalf of the community must > ultimately be accountable to the whole community, and the community must > have the power to reverse any decision made by an individual or > committee, and even to remove that individual from power, or dissolve > the committee and reform it. But... I mean, I agree, but isn't it inevitable that some people aren't going to want to be as involved with the decision-making process, just by nature of their personality or whatever? Without being disenfranchised by the community, that person automatically has less power (by choice, but still less power) than those who participate more fully and often? -Maggi _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
-
Re: the importance of clearly defined process & power Ed Stauff, February 2 2002
- Re: Re: the importance of clearly defined process & power Maggi Rohde, February 2 2002
-
Full Participation in Decision Making Sharon Villines, February 3 2002
- Re: Full Participation in Decision Making Maggi Rohde, February 3 2002
- Re: the importance of clearly defined process & power Ed Stauff, February 3 2002
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.