RE: dues and an experimental structure | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Ruddick, T.R. (RUDDICK![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 08:31:01 -0700 (MST) |
Here in Dayton OH we are in the very first stages of organizing. We've met, set up email discussion and web sites, assigned primary author for charter documents and public relations, another member is shopping for attorneys, another is coordinating our first public outreach meeting. Four or five households strong, so far! We're kicking around an innovative idea--I'm wondering what people think of this one. Basically, we're thinking of organizing on two levels. On one level, we're interested in an urban community, probably doing some retrofit, probably working closely with existing Dayton OH urban renewal authorities (one of our members has lots of key contacts at city hall and other revitalization groups). So we're going to do the typical sorts of incorporation, buy-in, investment, meet-greet-eat-compete-complete processes. But on another level we think it might be good to organize a sort of "umbrella" organization that could act as central resource/recruitment organization for as many cohousing projects as our region would generate. The thought process is that Dayton Cohousing, Inc., would be a cheap organization to join and would require little active involvement by most members: its function would be to publicize cohousing, recruit, advise, consult, promote, and generate cohousing projects but not to actually build or maintain them. It would be run by a small elected board. Our urban retrofit would be the first affiliate; as we go along, others may want to do lofts, suburban, rural, cheap, expensive, and other communities. Each community would operate independently. A side benefit of having a cheap umbrella organization would be the "foot-in-the-door" phenomenon--if people could join the interest group for, say, $15.00 per year, then they'll feel an initial sense of involvement--which will make them more committed to taking the next step and actually forming a community. SO: does this sound whacky to too many people here who have more practical experience than I? Where are the pitfalls that I'm not seeing? Help help help! _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
-
RE: dues and an experimental structure Ruddick, T.R., February 28 2002
- Re: RE: dues and an experimental structure Selwyn Polit, March 1 2002
- Re: RE: dues and an experimental structure Raines Cohen, February 28 2002
- RE: dues and an experimental structure George Marx, March 2 2002
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.