Re: Dancing with Wolves (in Cohousing)-off topic | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Howard Landman (howard![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 08:19:01 -0700 (MST) |
Liz wrote: >> if it was a starling, you'd be doing bluebirds a favor by killing >> it. It is a non-native species to North America, believe it or not! Robert wrote: > Killing creatures because they are not convenient just does not sound > right to me. There are two value-sets in conflict here. (1) Don't mess with Mother Nature and don't kill. (2) Value biodiversity and try to prevent or undo the damage caused by human activity. In normal biology, species making the leap from (say) Europe to North America occur infrequently. But since humans learned how to build globe-spanning highways, railroads, ships, and airplanes, the pace of this has been vastly accelerated. Some tidbits: - Tumbleweed (Siberian Thistle) was introduced into North America in the late 1800s. It rapidly spread through the entire Great Plains. Nothing can eat it, so it reduced the food available for wildlife, and also caused (and still causes) major problems for farmers and livestock producers. (Those mid-20th-century cowboy movies full of tumbleweeds are anachronistic fantasies.) - Snails are not native to California. They were introduced by a French gastronome who liked escargot, and promptly escaped from his backyard. Thus all California snails are edible (you need to feed them cornmeal for a day or so to purge possible plant toxins from their digestive tract) and in fact choice, if you like that sort of thing. But they've been so successful that they've pushed other, native, gastropods out of their niches. There are literally tens of thousands of cases like this. The net result is a homogenization of the biosphere with a severe reduction in its overall complexity, diversity, and ability to adapt. Of course, the biosphere has often been radically simplified in the past, and has come back. But often the collapse-and-regrowth has eliminated dominant megazoa, such as dinosaurs or humans, so that we have some reason to be concerned for our own species, as well as many others. This concern has led many to believe that good stewardship of the planet must include active efforts to preserve biodiversity, and one important piece of that is favoring local native plants and animals over imported ones. (There are other pieces, such as the identification and propagation of useful rare strains; one good organization working in this area is Native Seeds/Search of Tucson AZ. (www.nativeseeds.org)) Several people in River Rock pushed our landscaping in the direction of more native plants. This doesn't mean there are no foreign flowers or fruit trees, bt just that we made a conscious effort to include native plants where appropriate. This also tied in with the idea of xeriscaping (landscaping with plants that don't need much water). Howard A. Landman River Rock Commons Fort Collins CO _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
-
Re: Dancing with Wolves (in Cohousing)-off topic Robert Heinich, March 3 2002
-
Re: Dancing with Wolves (in Cohousing)-off topic Kevin Wolf, March 3 2002
- Re: Dancing with Wolves (in Cohousing)-off topic Robyn Williams, March 3 2002
- Re: Dancing with Wolves (in Cohousing)-off topic Howard Landman, March 4 2002
- Re: Dancing with Wolves (in Cohousing)-off topic Sara A., March 4 2002
-
Re: Dancing with Wolves (in Cohousing)-off topic Kevin Wolf, March 3 2002
-
Re: Dancing with Wolves (in Cohousing)-off topic Robert Heinich, March 3 2002
- politically incorrect in Sacramento Elizabeth Stevenson, March 3 2002
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.