More affordable housing ideas | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rob Sandelin (floriferous![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2002 22:40:08 -0600 (MDT) |
There are several models of cohousing. The most common, and in my opinion, most expensive, is the capital project model, where the whole development is designed and built as one large capital project. Other models, which again in my opinion, are probably cheaper, are the lot, and retrofit models. I live at Sharingwood which is a lot model of cohousing. In this model, the group designs the site around building lots and then allows individuals to buy lots and design and develop their own homes. This model allows for owner-builders, and a wide variety of housing types. You can have yurts, shacks, handmade homes, etc. In my community there is a 120 square foot home (like a small shed)made of recycled lumber which cost nothing to build but time, and a custom timber framed 4,000 sq. foot home which cost over half a million dollars. Each works wonderfully for its occupants. Another small natural materials home is being designed which has a target cost of $30,000. You can't do stuff like this in capital project models, the banks decide what you can build, and you have to all conform to the layout. In a lot model, as long as your legal stuff is in order, you can build whatever you want. Obviously small hand built homes will not get bank mortgages, but the point of those homes is to NOT have a mortgage in the first place. You can of course get mortgages for homes that qualify, so you have the best of both worlds. However the downside, from my experience, is that often you can end up with large, overly pretentious homes which people buy for lots of money, then later want to sell for a profit and this causes the prices of homes to exceed their value, and then such homes don't sell. Obviously developing land into lots uses more land than attached wall housing does, although I suppose you could also create duplex lots or other creative ways to share walls or structures. So If you decide to do this model, I would encourage you to put into place architectural review standards, where the community has to approve plans, and setup guideline as to maximum house size and costs, among other things. This gives you some control over having too many oversized homes. The other downside is the home construction can go on for a long time. We are building our 24th home out of 29 lots and the first home went in in 1988. Rob Sandelin Sharingwood www.sharingwood.org --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.332 / Virus Database: 186 - Release Date: 3/6/02 _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
- Re: Trading Systems, (continued)
- Re: Trading Systems Peg Blum, April 5 2002
-
Trading Systems George Marx, April 5 2002
-
Re: Trading Systems Howard Landman, April 5 2002
- Re: [C-L] Affordable (Was Trading Systems) Sharon Villines, April 6 2002
- More affordable housing ideas Rob Sandelin, April 7 2002
- Lot development model cohousing [was: More affordable housing ideas Fred H Olson, April 8 2002
- RE: Lot development model cohousing [was: More affordable housing ideas Rob Sandelin, April 10 2002
- Re: Lot development model cohousing [was: More affordable housing ideas Sheila Braun, April 10 2002
- Re: Lot development model cohousing [was: More affordable housing ideas Jeff Zucker, April 10 2002
-
Re: Trading Systems Howard Landman, April 5 2002
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.