Re: Learning from Hard Decisions | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Jim Snyder-Grant (jimsg![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 19:01:02 -0600 (MDT) |
In our 6 years of development process & 6 years living here (Acton MA), we've certainly had some tough decisions. Here's one story. I may send another shortly. *The sidewalk through the woods* The site plan called for walking paths of handicap grade to get access to all houses. That was tricky, as we are on a slope that is steeper than handicap grade -- lots of 'wiggly' sidewalks. The one part of this that became controversial was through one of the few stands of trees in the middle of our site - some folks felt that the path as drawn would have caused way too many trees to come down. A third tension point emerged later: one family felt that some of the options meant that they would have insufficient screening -- that this was the only side of their house where they might be able to look out and not see houses. So there were competing values of preserving trees and natural beauty, preserving handicap access, and preserving privacy. All of these values were recognized in our charter as shared values and goals. I think there were not additional hidden issues that drived the discussion - this was plenty. At a long meeting, we did not reach consensus. There was no clear way forward for a while. Then, we authorized three folks representing those three points of view to walk the par of the site in question, to see if new ideas emerged. Feelings were high enough that we did not trust this group to just resolve the issue, but instead we asked them to report back to an extra meeting scheduled a few days away. That worked, after a while. The meeting in the woods started warily, but the three of them eventually proposed a trail that had two sections at an OK grade, plus one middle section that was too steep. It was further proposed that if any member needed it, the group would install a railing at the steep section. The trail was designed with a level 'resting' section at the top of the steep part. The trail would be a sidewalk (paved) so that scooters & chairs could travel OK (there had been talk of keeping that part of the sidewalk unpaved). The route avoided most of the larger trees. It kept a good buffer of trees next to the concerned household. The group was happy enough about it, when we got together again, that the proposal passed. What we learned was two fold: 1) Talking about design issues in the abstract is a lot harder & more prone to absolutism than getting out into the space and question& seeing what teh various alternatives might be. 2) Delegating stuff to smaller concerned groups can be an Excellent Thing, even when the larger group doesn't see a way out. _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
-
Learning from Hard Decisions Joani Blank, July 9 2002
- Re: Learning from Hard Decisions Martie Weatherly, July 10 2002
- Re: Learning from Hard Decisions Jim Snyder-Grant, July 10 2002
- RE: Learning from Hard Decisions Rob Sandelin, July 15 2002
- RE: Learning from Hard Decisions Rob Sandelin, July 15 2002
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.