Cohousing-L Mailing List: Re: Re: Relevance of "isms" to Cohousing discussion list

[Elizabeth Stevenson (tamgoddess]

I would normally agree, (and probably get myself in trouble somehow), but
since there was nothing else going on, it seemed harmless enough. Perhaps if
someone had a burning question they wanted to ask, we could get back on
topic?


-- 
Liz Stevenson
Southside Park Cohousing
Sacramento, California
tamgoddess [at] attbi.com

> From: "Hans Tilstra" <tilstra [at] smartchat.net.au>
> Reply-To: cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org
> Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 21:17:32 +1000
> To: <cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org>
> Subject: [C-L]_Re: Relevance of "isms" to Cohousing discussion list
> 
> One of the key qualities of this list vs. other discussion lists I have
> unsubsribed to, is it's collective discipline to stick to topics that are
> related to cohousing. The arguments about racism really seem more than
> peripheral to this. Please note that I am not suggesting that the issue
> itself is peripheral, just the context in which it takes place.
> 
> regards,
> Hans
> http://home.vicnet.net.au/~cohouse
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Cohousing-L mailing list
> Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org  Unsubscribe  and other info:
> http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l

_______________________________________________
Cohousing-L mailing list
Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org  Unsubscribe  and other info:
http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l